As a man, it is suggested that I would have excelled if I was assessed predominantly by exams. In reality, that is how I was assessed anyway and I did pretty well. Nevertheless, I have always enjoyed getting stuck into the odd project and having time to turn into something I know will get good marks.

It seems that a mixture is probably the ideal scenario, ensuring that those who hate exams don’t have to face too many all at once, but also making sure that those who hate coursework aren’t too bogged down in it to revise for exams.

Let me know your thoughts on the matter.

The idea is that boys would be given the chance to take part in an increased number of seated exams, whilst girls would be given the opportunity to take on extra coursework. This move would appear to be supported by research showing boys’ preference for traditional exams and girls’ fondness for coursework.

Although some have welcomed opening a debate on the issue, others have criticised the idea because it involves stereotyping according to sex.

It’s been over a decade since my exams, and I remember the pressure all too clearly, but to be sat at home, worrying about getting in safely, and feeling that I should get in even if it is not safe, would have sent me into a panic. But those sitting at home won’t be faring any better, because they won’t be able to “re-sit” them until the summer, alongside all of their other exams.

I wouldn’t want to be a teenager again for all the tea in China.